“茶颜观色”告“茶颜悦色”一案败诉,网红品牌商标纠纷频出
广州“茶颜观色”商标持有方洛旗公司(以下简称“原告”)于2019年将奶茶品牌“茶颜悦色”告上法庭,诉其商标侵权。2020年4月8日,该案由长沙市岳麓区人民法院一审宣判,“茶颜悦色”胜诉,原告方的全部诉讼请求被驳回。
广州“茶颜观色”商标持有方洛旗公司(以下简称“原告”)于2019年将奶茶品牌“茶颜悦色”告上法庭,诉其商标侵权。2020年4月8日,该案由长沙市岳麓区人民法院一审宣判,“茶颜悦色”胜诉,原告方的全部诉讼请求被驳回。
2014年8月5日,北京市第三中级人民法院发布微博称,已经成功调解特斯拉公司与占宝生之间涉及商标、著作权和不正当竞争等一系列知识产权纠纷案,当事双方握手言和,占宝生放弃使用“tesla”等相关标识,特斯拉公司则放弃对占宝生两项诉讼及金额赔偿。从此,特斯拉公司在中国拥有了无可争议的商标使用权和专有权。现在,我们来回顾一下这件商标纠纷案的始末。
2020年1月5日,关于最高人民法院判决“江小白”商标案胜诉的声明显示,重庆江小白酒业有限公司(简称“江小白公司”)于2020年1月3日收到中华人民共和国最高人民法院《行政判决书》,最高人民法院判定江小白公司胜诉并判决撤销北京市高级人民法院(2018)京行终2122号行政判决,同时维持了北京知识产权法院(2017)京73行初1213号行政判决。本次判决为终审判决,持续七年的“江小白”商标纠纷案终于落下帷幕。
Room 1416, No.6 Xiaogang 1st Road
Shibei District
Qingdao, 266001, China
0532-80919761
0532-82086097
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this Site has been obtained from reliable sources, Verburg attorneys is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this Site is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchant ability and fitness for a particular purpose.
In no event will Verburg attorneys, its related partnerships or corporations, or the partners, agents or employees thereof be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this Site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.