专业人士解读乔丹耐克的商标之争
近日,最高人民法院审结了乔丹体育股份有限公司商标争议案,判决其商标并未损害Michael Jordan肖像权。最高法认为商标没有体现Michael Jordan个人特征,不具有可识别性,乔丹体育股份有限公司也并未利用他的形象进行宣传,不构成损害肖像权。这段长达8年的“乔丹商标案”终于告一段落。
近日,最高人民法院审结了乔丹体育股份有限公司商标争议案,判决其商标并未损害Michael Jordan肖像权。最高法认为商标没有体现Michael Jordan个人特征,不具有可识别性,乔丹体育股份有限公司也并未利用他的形象进行宣传,不构成损害肖像权。这段长达8年的“乔丹商标案”终于告一段落。
Room 1416, No.6 Xiaogang 1st Road
Shibei District
Qingdao, 266001, China
0532-80919761
0532-82086097
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this Site has been obtained from reliable sources, Verburg attorneys is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this Site is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchant ability and fitness for a particular purpose.
In no event will Verburg attorneys, its related partnerships or corporations, or the partners, agents or employees thereof be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this Site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.